Sunday, March 29, 2015

Photographer Series #16: danielshotkatemoss


German artist Daniel Voelker is constantly looking towards the fight between old & new. He flirts with a visual dominance by delivering the viewer an overdose of colors, shapes and impressions. While his pieces are immediately visually compelling, there is constantly more within and behind the work ...

Daniel says that “the red line of all my works is the fight between analog vs. digital”. In addition to the conceptual questions he is addressing, he enjoys the idea of the viewer literally “changing their position”, so as to “see more and different things”.

Daniel Voelker's Overdose 05, 2007
Coming from a traditional route of studying photography, then undertaking commercial fashion, advertisement and portrait work, he struggled with the way images were being used and perceived.

With titles such as 'Overdose', 'Crossover' and 'Analog Pixels' it is no surprise that his art deals with "the everyday flood of pictures". He believes that the images often become "meaningless since there are so many, and you can't really focus or concentrate on each of them”. 

Exploring this proliferation of images and questioning the way we observe them is, in essence, the same notion behind the creation of the ishotkatemoss.com project. It was therefore a beautiful surprise to find that he too has begun to use kate, but in a way that we hope you will find as astounding as we have.

Having previously created series that layered porn images with old nude paintings, and also working with found slides that he scanned and then covered the central motifs with digital raster graphics, Daniel's latest body of work has taken his analog vs. digital battle to another level by appropriating the idea of mosaic image making through the utilization of stamps.

Using philately to such an extreme is the opposite of the annoying movement for digital mosaic images, which seemed to have their heyday approximately twenty years ago. In the field of photographic imaging, a 'photomosaic' is a picture that has been divided into, usually equal sized rectangular, sections each of which is replaced with another photograph that in someway matches the target photo. When viewed at low magnifications, the individual pixels appear as the primary image, while the picture is in fact made up of many hundreds of smaller images. Nowadays anyone can access software that can generate such a computer-created montage of your family, your dog or a masterpiece in a matter of minutes.

Daniel however, in his recent series “Analog Pixels”, follows this process with stamps.
Daniel Voelker (DV): My stamp mosaics deal with longing; longing for ‘good old times’, longing for meaning, longing for fame and beauty and/or longing for someone (who wrote that letter to someone else, maybe even a love letter).

iskm: Why kate as a subject?
DV: I used kate moss and other famous models because they are modern icons for many people. Also, as I come from the fashion industry as a photographer, using images of (super)models was a bridge. The fashion/photography industry is very fast, you have hundreds and thousands of photographs every day in magazines around the world and a week later those images are forgotten. Using stamps and taking the time I need to do each of these mosaics I work against this forgetting and the pace. The pictures become something very unique and, hopefully, remembered. These pictures are not exchangeable like all the photographs in magazines every day. It takes time and patience, which is something I really miss these days.
Kate, 2014 Mosaic made of 1827 postage stamps
iskm: Why stamps? How did you come to use them as art?
Detail from a portion of Kate, 2014 mosaic
DV: My mom used to collect stamps. While helping her move houses a couple of years ago I found her collection in a box. I remembered playing with the stamps when I was a child and looking them over I thought that each of them was an artwork unto itself. I also found a fascinating kind of ‘treasure hunting’ feeling. However, at that time though, I didn't think "oh, nice, I can make art with this". A while later I came across some mosaic ‘art’ and I thought, that’s nice but didn't connect the dots … one day, I thought that I should make mosaics with the stamps. My series "Overdose" are all squares because of the pixels, so it seemed to be a natural progression to make "Analog Pixels" with stamps. 

iskm: Where do you get the stamps? Are they all from the same country? From the same time period?
DV: I get the stamps mainly on ebay, some I get from people who would like to be a part of the process. They are usually from Germany since that is where I have the best access. For consistency, each picture uses only the same size of stamp. Therefore, as every country uses different sizes, I only use stamps from one country for a piece. The stamps are from multiple periods, some of them are 100 years old, some pretty new.
Kate Moss/W, 2013 Mosaic made with 2067 stamps

iskm: Do you sort by color? How do you choose the stamps?
DV: In addition to size, I sort them by color and also by shade otherwise I couldn't do the fading from dark to bright. If I didn’t fade, they would look like Warhol prints with defined black hair, red lips, blue eyes and so on … with this shading I attempt to make them look more photorealistic.

iskm: How long did it take to make each kate piece?
DV: It takes about 3-4 months from the beginning (getting them on ebay) to the end (gluing the last stamp) for each picture. I glue them stamp by stamp.


The original Kate W cover

iskm: What is the significance of an analog, hand made, process for you?
DV: I don't like digital that much, especially in photography. Everyone can take good looking pictures of anything these days … like your food, your knees at some beach or the self-loving "selfies". You put a filter (ironically often vintage) above it and all looks great! Everyone tries to make them look analog, but very few shoot film because either they don't know how to use the older cameras or they want the result immediately to retouch them in photoshop or to post them on social media ... analog means something like "real", "unique" or "genuine" to me. It’s handmade.

iskm: Which photographers/artists would you most want to most see involved in ishotkatemoss?
DV: I admire and get inspired by many but the photographer I would pick would be Richard Avedon. His way of taking pictures of strangers made regular people into personalities. When you see his pictures you can see the subject’s soul and feel how they felt the moment that picture was taken. I would also like to see what some painters could produce … someone like Gerhard Richter. Or what would Jackson Pollock have made of this? Both Richter and Pollack have had this amazing feeling to use color. They both don't know in the beginning how the picture will turn out in the end, but when they see "it" they know. They would stop, and they made a masterpiece. I admire their playfulness using color and paint.
And then, marrying the photography and painting is Chuck Close, who of course has actually shot kate. When you get near to his portraits, you just see squares with different shapes and colors in a grid, when you step back you start seeing a persons face. I just love the effect!
If you would ask me this question in 2 months, I might pick different artists. This changes sometimes depending on my mood!

iskm: ishotkatemoss uses a catch phrase, “Observe. Slow Down. Shoot. Submit.” in the context of what we do and how we encourage others to see and think. It seems as though, particularly with “Analog Pixels”, in using stamps, you have taken the idea of observation and slowing down to an extreme.
DV: What I also really liked about it was that stamps are dying out and with my work I can kind of keep them alive. I think stamps are beautiful and they have this nice, calm energy. Stamps are normally connected with boredom but using them to do art makes them even more interesting again. Plus it’s a little history for everyone. And maybe someone will find a stamp in my pictures, which is in fact really valuable (because I don't have the time to check all of them)! 

Here at ishotkatemoss, we definitely see the value in Daniel’s process. So have a look at more of his work at www.danielvoelker-art.com and use whatever inspires you to:

Observe. Slow Down. Shoot. Submit.

Monday, March 16, 2015

Gonzalo & Jacinto

Definitely our favorite submission to the ishotkatemoss collage this week, from Gonzalo Herrera (instagram @gonzirella) with kate and his italian greyhound, Jacinto:
Don't kiss me kate ... kiss me Jacinto!

Observe. Slow Down. Shoot. Submit

Wednesday, March 4, 2015

Parsons: Workshop for Students

ishotkatemoss is presenting a workshop at Parsons The New School for Design. Members of the iskm family, Saul Robbins and Zev Jonas, will be in attendance.

We are very much looking forward to meeting the students. More information can be found on the Parsons web site

Attending students will: Observe. Slow Down. Shoot. Submit

Thursday, February 26, 2015

Photographer Series #15: flynshotkatemoss


Photographer? Collage Maker? Artist? Flyn Vibert is all of these yet isn’t interested in any one label. “My practice takes me so far that I really don’t know any more (or even care) whether I’m an artist or a photographer. I’ve been pushing for a long time now. … I don’t think it’s enough to just take photos anymore. I take from anywhere, I don’t have set ideas, there is no formula. I find influence in everything. Every image is different.
An image from Flyn's series Fragments
Flyn, who has both an MA in fashion photography and a BA in photography, works towards what he has referred to as "poorer photography". This means "no Photoshop, no retouching, no darkroom or digital manipulation, just photography" to create his images, which look more like works of multimedia art.
He has described the use of his techniques as adding a level or performance to what is traditionally a very static art. This performance aspect allows him to pour everything into his work - anger, passion, hate, love - in order to push the image further.

ishotkatemoss (iskm): How do you approach your creative process?
Flyn Vibert (FV): My whole approach is physical. I appropriate, I manipulate and juxtapose, I re-light and then I re-photograph. I’ll use whatever methods I can to push my own limits … The story writes itself. I never follow a script yet I work with narrative and I am fascinated by fairytale. Ancient and magical, macabre and melancholy, illusion and hallucination, contradiction and combination, fantasy and reality. There are no rules. Anything is possible.

iskm: Why do you feel that fairytale concepts, the magical, macabre and melancholy seep into your work?
FV: I think we're all inherently drawn to fairytale at some level. As children we're told stories of giants, evil witches, living scarecrows, talking tigers, magic beans, and so on. What's fascinating to me is that these classic tales were wonderfully dark and twisted: from the evil queen in Snow White who orders huntsman to kill an innocent girl, the Big Bad Wolf in Little Red Riding Hood who swallows her grandma whole, and the cannibal witch in Hansel and Gretel who wants to devour children. Brothers Grimm have a lot to answer for. More recently I began reading a book called "Heroes and Villains", by feminist author Angela Carter, which opened my eyes to the possibility of surrounding my imagery with a sense of narrative. Both dark and unsettling, yet also highly seductive.

iskm: Your images constantly have faces/people as their source. Why manipulate the face?
FV: I've always been drawn to people. Every human, every face is a new story.

iskm: How/why do you select the source images in your work?
FV: I've always believed in following my gut. It's what much of my work is about. I want to see where the subconscious takes us. I am a serial collector. I have cuttings going back years. I find it painful to throw anything away. When it comes to selecting the images, it's about being in the moment. I could choose this image or that one, but in the end it's about making a decision and seeing where it takes you. Every image is a different journey.
"I’ve shot with Kate Moss, Courtney Love, Iggy Pop, Grimes, Karen O, Sid Vicious, Cara Delevingne, and Bjork ... They just don’t know it yet." Flyn Vibert
iskm: What interests you about kate?
FV: She's a fascinating creature. We've all followed her for so long that she has become a part of our lives. We read about her in magazines, we blog about her, instagram pictures of her, and celebrate her birthday like an old friend. She has lived her life in the public consciousness. From Corinne Day's portraits of a sweet, young innocent council estate kid to her status as a supermodel and the face of fashion, her drug-addled relationship with Pete Doherty to her re-birth into motherhood. Her image endures - her life is now (almost) seen as a fairytale.
iskm: How and why do you select the source images for the kate moss work? 
FV: I have a collection of Kate Moss images. Some taken from magazines and newspapers, others off the web. It's not hard to find images of her. There was no specific reason behind the ones I chose, not consciously anyway. In a way, every image of her is the same at it's root. Her image is now so omnipresent that it is almost impossible to escape that familiarity.
iskm: What did you do to your chosen kate moss images and why? 
FV: Every image is different and the process for each varies. Lighting is the only constant. I'll use anything to 'enhance' my images... stale red wine, cigarette ash, dead flower petals, paints and oil pastels, felt tip pens, nail polish, chemical fluids, diesel oil, even fire. The one thing I don't use is digital manipulation. I prefer the physicality and want to touch my images. To feel the inks running through my fingertips, to watch the surface crackle as I scratch away at it. It's a beautiful, expressive, transient experience for me to shoot. I want people to feel my images are touchable.

iskm: But the final piece of art that you create is a photograph of the collage?
FV: It is always a photograph of what I have made. There is an essence of the decisive moment in this, as many of the things I create 'die' after a certain time. So I don't actually align myself with collage, even though my images do sometimes have a lot in common with collage!
iskm: Which photographer/s would you most want to most see involved in ishotkatemoss?
FV: I'd love to see what Jean-Luc Godard would do if ever given the chance. I can't even imagine what he thinks of Kate Moss, but his response would be fascinating. He once shot a fashion film for the Marithé François Girbaud label in the 80's. You can find it on youtube if you dare. Fashion through the eye of a new-wave filmmaker. It's either terrible or wonderful. I can't decide. David Lynch would be another. He's a very important influence for me, even if it is never obvious in the work itself. I wonder how he would cast Kate Moss in one of his films.

iskm: Thanks so much Flyn.
FV: I've very much enjoyed the whole process of us talking. Just one last thing, tell Kate to drop me a line if she ever wants a portrait taken!

A deep dark, scary portrait of fairytale kate … that we would love to see. In the meantime, don’t let your kids fall asleep to the fashion mags. Instead show them Flyn’s work, more of which you can be viewed at www.flynvibert.com, so that they too can:
Observe. Slow Down. Shoot. Submit.

Thursday, February 19, 2015

The censorship of deviants

Following on the heels of our instagram censorship experience, comes an interesting tale found via some work of note on DeviantArt (DA).

DA is a web site that believes that they “are where art starts”. They state: “We are the movement for the liberation of creative expression. We believe that art is for everyone, and we're creating the cultural context for how it is created, discovered, and shared.” The site, which was founded in August 2000, states that at its essence, its core and what is most important is that they “Bleed and Breed Art”. Their site, appears to be a genuine place of creativity, experience, community and sharing. The art is mixed and divergent, both in style and quality. “Our world is a prolific orgy of originality where creatives enjoy freedom of artistic expression.
Kate by Miguel Enguidanos, deviant artist

The site claims to be “the largest online social network for artists”. With apparently “over 32 million registered members” and attracting “over 65 million unique visitors per month” it seems to be a site of some relevance in the context of the ongoing dialogue and distribution of new work online.

The members - known as “deviants” - upload “over 160,000 original art works every day” … “everything from painting and sculpture to digital art, pixel art, films, and anime”.

ishotkatemoss explored the site and agreed that it had validity in assisting many ‘creatives’, yet we were not attracted to a great deal of work. Some dialogue ensued with a few artists who were utilizing kate’s visage in the creation of work that commented on their experience and/or society, rather than just fan art – of which there was copious amounts, most of which appeared to simply copy imagery in the public space.
One of many fan art examples on the site: A drawing of the lovely model by '7-Year-Bytch' and the original photograph
The highlight was coming across the work of the artist ‘lowerrider’ which included one or two with kate that we found hilarious and worth highlighting. There is not a great deal of information as to why he chooses to manipulate regular day-to-day images by re-proportioning one or more woman in an image, resulting in starting results.
lowerrider's Naomi Campbell and Kate Moss
Our attempts to interview, also have not been successful ... yet, in what he has written about his work, he approaches his commentary with a droll sense of humor. Unfortunately however, not everyone has been so amused by lowerrider’s efforts, as documented in his “Devious Journal entries”, a sample of which are copied here:

by lowerrider, Apr 5, 2013, 2:25:37 PM
Well its been a little over a year since I came over to DA...and so far its been great. Its nice to see some of the same people here from other communities and OTHER picture sites...I still don't understand why my site was shut down over there,( many similar ones are still thriving)...maybe some un-named celebrity was upset ?? Oh well   I guess I'll never know.  Thanks to all that have viewed my stuff...special thanks to all that have favorited my work and extra-special thanks to those members who take the time to write a comment.... positive...constructive....or preferences (negs will be hidden and most likely members blocked). I doubt I can keep up the pace I have been on...but who knows...as long as there are good source pics      thanks

by lowerrider, Oct 20, 2013, 2:01:06 PM
More of lowerrider's work
... In light of what happened to fellow collager Fred27104...If you like my deviations don't just favorite them..DOWNLOAD them NOW ! If I dissapear or get closed down I will be at GiantessCity....and may release my stuff to Giantessbooruu

by lowerrider, Dec 20, 2013, 3:29:02 AM
Now it looks like they got megalover93...
… it is just a matter of time...

by lowerrider, Feb 7, 2014, 5:23:09 AM
Now don't be alarmed if some of my pics are 'in storage'... I believe it was the right thing to do...
if you don't see whats gone...than it really doesn't matter anyway...right ?

I will keep on doing what I'm doing...sadly they were some worthy collages... oh well...

by lowerrider, Sep 11, 2014, 6:30:46 PM
OK guys looks like the END may be coming....Download the pictures that you like, don't just save them...... I just got a few of these messages from DA
I had a feeling something bad would happen on Sept 11th....hmmmm
We have moved 2 of your deviations from "Digital Art > Photomanipulation > Fantasy" to " Scraps".
The administrator also said the following:
Following review, your deviation is being placed in your Scrapbook because it was created using material that is not a valid stock image or other resource ...
Our copyright policy, in brief, states that your submissions may only contain materials or images which were created entirely through your own effort, authorized stock or resources and materials or images for which you have obtained permission for use in the submission.
This means that content such as screenshots, celebrity photographs, video game sprites, and other similar materials are not typically considered to be valid resources for use in submissions to your deviantART gallery unless you have obtained written permission from the copyright holder.
Failure to obtain proper permission for the use of materials protected under copyright can leave your deviantART submission vulnerable to being removed by our staff following a valid claim of infringement against it.

And some interesting replies to this post:
Balore84 Sep 12, 2014
"This means that content such as screenshots, celebrity photographs, video game sprites, and other similar materials are not typically considered to be valid resources for use in submissions to your deviantART gallery unless you have obtained written permission from the copyright holder."
… Srsly tho, this is ridiculous. Like fucking hell I'm asking permission to use a public celebrity photo.
apollocreed23 Sep 12, 2014  
celebrity's images on the web are public, they can't remove them... in that case deviantart could be closed completely

All of this got us thinking, yet again, about the contradictions in 'art', business (which, ultimately - given all of the pop up ads - is what DeviantArt, Instagram, Facebook etc), photography, image use, copyright laws and, of course, freedom of speech.

Remember the statement from DA: Our world is a prolific orgy of originality where creatives enjoy freedom of artistic expression? Really? Feels like censorship to iskm. 

What is appropriate? Appropriated ...
Observe. Slow Down. Resize. Shoot. Submit.

Monday, February 9, 2015

Censorship and racks


An interesting lesson today ...

As ishotkatemoss continues our daily instagram image posts we are constantly challenged by the need to crop images square, figure out how to reach new people, identify like-minded artistic minds and continue the conversation behind enemy lines. 

In other words, we struggle with the apparent contradiction of asking people to view images in a slower and more considered approach by posting photographs on the largest image distributor, owned by Facebook, and utilized by the vast majority in a split second. Furthermore, we are now partaking in the affirmation complex of simply pressing 'like' ...

For all of the struggle however, we continue to find new collaborators for our work, and allow people who otherwise would not have learned of ishotkatemoss, the opportunity to see the collage and this blog.

So it was with great consternation and finally humor that after posting the following image and text on instagram today, we found that the post had been publicly banned:

In the lead up to Valentine's Day and the anniversary of the remarkable submission from Keren Moscovitch, we are revisiting some ishotkatemoss observed playboy pics. Let's start with magazine racks from "A rolling photographer gathers moss" #ishotkatemoss #katemoss #valentines #romantic #playboy #bunny #magazine #rack #observe #slowdown #shoot #submit

Why? Well after a great deal of experimentation (honestly, we felt like Benedict Cumberbatch in The Imitation Game), it turns out that if you use the hashtag "#rack" your post is flagged for no public distribution ...

Now anyone who has been on instagram I am sure has seen plenty of breasts, including kates! But from our minimal, non-scientific research we have found that the terms "breast", "breasts", "boob" and "knockers" are also banned, in addition to "rack" (however, just for your reference, you can legally use "bust", "chest, "bosom", "funbags", "mammary", "mammaryglands" and "bazooms"). There seems to be a reasonable amount of research on-line about this, we only looked it up for the interesting articles, we promise.
So ultimately, all we want to know from Playboy, Instagram and all who censor us is "Where will we put our magazines?"
#censorship
#noracks 
#noknockers

Observe. Slow Down. Shoot. Submit.

Monday, February 2, 2015

Apocalipstick


Lipstick graffiti - An image snapped at the Staten Island Mall by austin_nyc and posted to instagram:

We love the smell of lipstick in the morning! 

Observe. Slow down. Shoot. Submit.

Wednesday, January 28, 2015

Pushing the boundaries and seeing what happens


Francesca Gavin recently wrote a piece for Artsy titled: 
“Steve Lazarides’s Banksy Auction Tests the Artist’s Market”

Lazarides photographed by Lars Fassinger
"Steve Lazarides is innately skilled at promotion. His career as a gallerist was for a decade intertwined with the artist Banksy - initially promoting and producing screenprints for Banksy and his imprint Pictures on Walls, before representing the artist as a gallerist. Lazarides’s gallery is now the definitive space for artists who have largely emerged from a street context, and next week Lazarides is putting up around 30 unsigned prints by Banksy at auction. The question everyone is asking is why?

“I want to see how far the market can go, to be honest,” Lazarides explains. “When you’re selling directly to a client, you set a price and that’s it. With auction you don’t really know what’s going to happen. Why not push boundaries and see what happens? Everybody does it - they just lie about it. I’m constantly being persecuted for being honest,” he laughs. Unlike many galleries, Lazarides does not work with the secondary market, focusing on largely young primary-market emerging names.
Banksy and Lazarides haven’t worked together for around seven years.“I don’t think we’ve spoken since 2008,” he considers. Nonetheless, Lazarides is the expert in Banksy’s market. “There aren’t many dealers and artists that have the kind of relationship that we had. It was an intense decade of being in each others’ lives. With the paintings, I probably know everything about them. With the screenprints, I was getting them printed, I numbered most of them. I then wrapped them up and stuck them in a fucking tube.” The Bonhams print sale, however, does not represent the gallerist’s desire to wash his hands of the artist, and he still has a significant personal holding on his work.

“I think the market has become so solid. The interest from people around the world is quite significant,” Lazarides muses. “This work has to really be absorbed into an overall umbrella of contemporary art. People like Shepard Fairey, Os Gêmeos, Vhils, JR, Conor Harrington - I think they’ve broken the shackles of being just urban artists. It’s not chumps buying the work. It’s very, very serious collectors.” 

The gallerist has uncovered a vast collection of unsigned prints that he sold to a secondhand furniture dealer on Brick Lane in the early days of Banksy’s career. The works were still in the packing Lazarides has presented them in. He brokered a deal to have access to this archive. Although unsigned, the works still have strong authenticity for Lazarides’s involvement and his relationship to Banksy. The gallerist also intends to find a way of releasing some of the unsigned prints on the market—aware that there are still 1.5 million people buying Banksy’s book who all wish to own a piece by the artist ..."

The auction in London is on January 28th (that is today people!) and included in this sale is none other than Kate Moss (Purple, Orange) from 2005:
Not one to miss an opportunity, we emailed the Director of Sales enquiring as to kate’s availability and price. We received the following response:

Hi ishotkatemoss,
Hope you're well and thanks for getting in touch.
This actually comes with all the other 5 colourways as a set of 6 for £500k.
I do have a single original colourway available for £95,000 + vat if of interest?
All the best

So, without factoring in tax (which may be able to be waived if we are taking it out of Europe, so as to hang on our fine NY walls), the single kate would set us back only US$145,000 plus shipping! For those who are looking for a slightly more affordable and tacky kate colorway, don't forget the Russell Marshall's inventory.
 
If anyone is seriously considering such a purchase, we’ll leave the last word to the subversive artist so many of us admire. With echoes of the Christie’s London kate sale that prompted our very own ishotkatemoss collage, on February 22, 2007, the day after Sotheby’s London sold three Banksy works, all of which soared above their auction estimates and into the six figures, the elusive and anonymous British graffiti artist updated his website with the following image of an auction house:
Observe. Slow Down. Shoot. Submit.

Monday, January 19, 2015

Photographer Series #14: reashotkatemoss


Rea Chen is a graduate from The China Academy of Art where she majored in printmaking. She recently moved to New York where she is undertaking her MFA at Parsons The New School.
Some of Rea's kites in her studio
While visiting Parsons we found her studio walls inundated with kites and knew she was a natural fit for ishotkatemoss

Each kite had a recognizable image (including the Queen, an Oscar statuette, Steve Jobs, Audrey Hepburn, Stephen Hawking, The Beatles etc.) wrapped around a bamboo frame, with beautiful ribbons adorning the sides and tail.

Rea descrices her art as "doubting the function and the formats of icons and finding the real value beyond the idol as symbol". She explores these themes by critiquing the extreme conditions in which iconography is found, while also trying to create balance in the possibilities of viewing such symbols.

iskm: Can you explain your project?
Rea Chen (RC): There are two backgrounds to the kite project. The first is a reference to the Basant Kite Festival, which has recently been abandoned in Pakistan. A potential reason for the cancellation is due to extreme Muslims not allowing the Festival to take place. I see this situation as so- called "extreme aniconism". The other reference is the Reenaction of Crucifixion in the Philippines and Mexico. At these reenactions many disciples experience a real crucifixion on every Good Friday. They have, in theory, a similar experience of Jesus, but they will get off from the cross at a point in the process and then repeat the action again next year. I describe it as "extreme idolism".
My hope is to reorganize the Basant Kite Festival, but in New York with uniquely constructed kites.

iskm: How do you build the kites? 
RC: I choose to build the kites using the core structure of a diamond kite, which has a cross beneath the kite paper, as its making process is similar to that of a crucifix. I use light materials to build the kites: bamboo sticks to build the structure, and I print the images onto rice paper. I affix the images onto the cross then I use a needle to stick through the left and right angles of the paper, let the string cross the two holes and make the spar bow. This process reminds me of the hanging and nailing of Jesus onto the cross. To complete the kite, I add the ribbons and lastly, I tie the string to be held when flying the kite.
 
iskm: Why do you select the images you do to put on the kites?
RC: I choose images of all kinds of western idols from Google searches. In the US, beliefs coexist and people can believe whatever they want. People should have the freedom to choose their beliefs. I feel that building the modern idols into kites and then letting people fly them is like worshiping and controlling some beliefs to critique the "extreme aniconism". However, I foresee the kites will fall down, get entangled and the images will be broken and the structures will be damaged. This part is to doubt the real function of idols, and critique the "extreme idolism".

iskm: After discovering the iskm project, Rea constructed a kate kite and photographed its flight:


iskm: Why did you select the source kate image that you did?
A cropped version of Rheims' photograph
RC: I chose a topless photo of Kate used in a worldwide ad campaign, which was taken when she was 16, by the French photographer Bettina Rheims*. Bettina has said that she shoots for the famous female superstars, to give them what they want. However, for an unconfident young girl, I question the validity of this and would expect that the girl would have a great deal of fear. After investigating, I found that Kate said she was pressured into showing her nude body, 'I'd lock myself in the toilet and cry'. She indicated that after this, her first nude shoot, she experienced a long 'nervous breakdown' and she cried for years and years. I felt that this is the real crucifixion of her, the mass show of her on all fashion media. She has to be hung on the cross, to face watching eyes with complex emotions. Kate became the world’s supermodel not only on her own, but also through a series of social selections - by others who control the kite string, to make her fly high or fall down. Even though she said she regretted doing the 1992 photo shoot that helped skyrocket her to fame, she became resigned and said 'I didn't like it, but it was work, and I had to do it'. There appeared to be a lack of anyone providing support or mental care and I can feel something through her eyes as if to say ‘To be or not to be?’.

iskm: Is there any reason the ribbon is red for kate?
RC: I use black ribbon for all, but for Jesus I utilized red ribbon, as the symbol of blood. I also used the red for Kate as I think she was crucified by the photographer and sanctified in the fashion industry.
iskm: Where did you fly the kite? Did you choose the locations for any special reason?
RC: I flew the kite along Fifth Ave; from the Parsons school, famous for its fashion major, down 5th Ave past the retail stores, to Central Park - where it finally became entangled by the tree branches. It meant flying the kite from the starting point of learning, through the fashion commerce and ultimately to the central destination of New York, the world’s hub for arts and entertainment.
 
iskm: How did people react?
RC: It was a little difficult to fly on NY streets because of the crowded conditions. Also, sometimes the kite string was entangled with pedestrians, which was a little bit dangerous. Some people took shots of it, and one policeman came to me. I thought I was in trouble but he appreciated that it was a lovely kite and it flew so well! He also asked who was on it, and I replied that it was Kate Moss and he let me continue. Many people looked up at the kite while I was walking, especially children.
 
iskm: Want happened to the kite? Did you leave it entangled in the trees?
RC: It was entangled on the branch in a very high place, I could do nothing but cut the string. I’m not sure how it is now, maybe it’s still there washed by the rain and snow, or it has fallen down and been swept away.
 
iskm: Do you intend to fly all of the kites together? If so, when?
RC: I’m still working on organizing the kite festival here in NY, but the date has not been decided as yet. It will depend on the weather, so more than likely we will need to wait for the spring.

iskm: Which photographer/s or artist/s would you most want to most see involved in ishotkatemoss? Why?
RC: I’d love to have seen Frida Kahlo interpret this project, because her own life was a beautiful appearance with strong torment inside, playing her role. In a strange way, I feel that there’s so much in common between the representations of both Frida and Kate.

iskm: A brief note that Rea returned to China over the winter break and we had great difficulty conducting portions of this interview as her email account was blocked. She commented during the process:
RC: Sorry for the block of instagram, facebook and google. I really feel helpless without the ability to be in contact with my friends.

It was a stark reminder, especially in the wake of our recent commentary on freedom of expression, that censorship often limits our ability to create an open, creative and positive dialogue.

If you are interested in learning more about the festival or even assisting Rea, she can be found on Facebook or via instagram where her handle is “chenhuiji”.

And, only as we will never have the chance to ever say this again: reashotkitemoss!
Observe. Slow Down. Fly. Shoot. Submit.

* This image is not readily available on the internet as it breaches the code of conduct of many sites, due to the fact that it shows an underage girl naked. iskm has chosen to display the image cropped. We wholeheartedly support Rea Chen's use of the photograph within her artistic process due to the fact that she is specifically commenting on the way the image had been taken, promoted and used. However, we endorse censorship of images that depict and/or promote the sexual exploitation of children.

Tuesday, January 13, 2015

Satire Lives

Text from Adam Gopnik, The New Yorker January 19, 2015 issue, interspersed with some cartoons and illustrations from around the world in response to the recent happenings in Paris:
Dave Brown, The Independent, UK
The staff of the French magazine Charlie Hebdo, massacred in an act that shocked the world last week, were not the gentle daily satirists of American editorial cartooning. Nor were they anything like the ironic observers and comedians of manners most often to be found in our own beloved stable here at The New Yorker. (Though, to be sure, the covers of this magazine have startled a few readers and started a few fights.) They worked instead in a peculiarly French and savage tradition, forged in a long nineteenth-century guerrilla war between republicans and the Church and the monarchy. There are satirical magazines and “name” cartoonists in London and other European capitals, particularly Brussels, but they tend to be artier in touch and more media-centric in concern. Charlie Hebdo was—will be again, let us hope—a satirical journal of a kind these days found in France almost alone. Not at all meta or ironic, like The Onion, or a place for political gossip, like the Paris weekly Le Canard Enchaîné or London’s Private Eye, it kept alive the nineteenth-century style of direct, high-spirited, and extremely outrageous caricature—a tradition begun by now legendary caricaturists, like Honoré Daumier and his editor Charles Philipon, who drew the head of King Louis-Philippe as a pear and, in 1831, was put on trial for lèse-majesté.
Lucille Clerc (not Banksy), French

Philipon’s famous faux-naïf demonstration of the process of caricature still brings home the almost primitive kind of image magic that clings to the act of cartooning. In what way was he guilty, Philipon demanded to know, since the King’s head was pear-shaped, and how could merely simplifying it to its outline be viewed as an attack? The coarser and more scabrous cartoons that marked the covers of Charlie Hebdo—and took in Jesus and Moses, along with Muhammad; angry rabbis and ranting bishops, along with imams—were the latest example of that tradition. In the era of the Internet, when images proliferate, merge, and alter in an Adobe second, one would think that the power of a simple, graffiti-like scrawl was minimal. Indeed, analysts of images and their life have been telling us for years that this sort of reaction couldn’t happen anymore—that the omnipresence of images meant they could not offend, that their meanings and their capacity to shock were enfeebled by repetition and availability. Even as the Islamist murderers struck in Paris, some media-studies maven in a liberal-arts college was doubtless explaining that the difference between our time and times past is that the ubiquity of images benumbs us and their proliferation makes us indifferent. Well, not quite. It is the images that enrage; many things drove the fanatics to their act, but it was cartoons they chose to fixate on. Drawings are handmade, the living sign of an ornery human intention, rearing up against a piety.
Michael de Adder, Canada

For those who recall Charlie Hebdo as it really, rankly was, the act of turning its murdered cartoonists into pawns in a game of another kind of public piety—making them martyrs, misunderstood messengers of the right to free expression—seems to risk betraying their memory. Wolinski, Cabu, Honoré: like soccer players in Brazil, each was known in France by a single name. A small irreverent smile comes to the lips at the thought of the flag being lowered, as it was throughout France last week, for these anarchist mischief-makers, and they would surely have roared at the irony of being solemnly mourned and marched for by former President Nicolas Sarkozy and the current President, François Hollande. The cartoonists didn’t just mock those men’s politics; they regularly amplified their sexual appetites and diminished their sexual appurtenances. It is wonderful to see Pope Francis condemning the horror, but also worth remembering that magazine’s special Christmas issue, titled “The True Story of Baby Jesus,” whose cover bore a drawing of a startled Mary giving notably frontal birth to her child. (Did the Pope see it?)
David Pope, The Canberra Times, Australia

Nor was it only people’s pieties that the cartoonists liked to tweak. Georges Wolinski, eighty years old, born of a Polish Jewish father and a Tunisian Jewish mother, caused a kerfuffle two years ago by creating a poster—for the Communist Party, no less—in favor of early retirement, which showed a happily retired man grabbing the rear ends of two apparently compliant miniskirted women. “Life Begins at Sixty” was the jaunty caption. Yet Wolinski, for all his provocations, was a life-affirming and broadly cultured bon vivant, who became something of an institution; in 2005, he was awarded the Légion d’ Honneur, the highest French decoration.

In recent years, Charlie Hebdo has had to scrabble for money. It gets lots of attention, but satirical magazines of opinion are no easier to finance in France than they are in America. Still, Wolinski and his confederates represented the true Rabelaisian spirit of French civilization, in their acceptance of human appetite and their contempt for false high-mindedness of any kind, including the secular high-mindedness that liberal-minded people hold dear. The magazine was offensive to Jews, offensive to Muslims, offensive to Catholics, offensive to feminists, offensive to the right and to the left, while being aligned with it—offensive to everybody, equally. (The name Charlie Hebdo came into being, in part, in response to a government ban that had put an earlier version of the magazine out of business; it was both a tribute to Charlie Brown and a mockery of Charles de Gaulle.)
Magnus Shaw, UK

The right to mock and to blaspheme and to make religions and politicians and bien-pensants all look ridiculous was what the magazine held dear, and it is what its cartoonists were killed for—and we diminish their sacrifice if we give their actions shelter in another kind of piety or make them seem too noble, when what they pursued was the joy of ignobility.

As the week came to its grim end, with the assassins dead and several hostages—taken not by chance in a kosher grocery store—dead, too, one’s thoughts turned again to the inextinguishable French tradition of dissent, the tradition of Zola, sustained through so much violence and so many civic commotions. “Nothing Sacred” was the motto on the banner of the cartoonists who died, and who were under what turned out to be the tragic illusion that the Republic could protect them from the wrath of faith. “Nothing Sacred”: we forget at our ease, sometimes, and in the pleasure of shared laughter, just how noble and hard-won this motto can be.
Observed ... www.ishotkatemoss.com